Evaluating the discussion on death penalty, it is no doubt that its negative factors surpass the positive aspects. Assessing the high population status in prisons and the cost of life imprisonment, it is clear that they cannot be replaced by capital punishment. However, this situation can be substituted by the death crime that is done by the accused person.
Besides justice that is dominant in a given case, individuals who are guilty of an offence should be granted an opportunity to learn from their crime. This is accomplished via rehabilitation when crime doers get the opportunity to under gore transformation. This step has a positive outcome to the society when it enhances its development. Furthermore, capital punishment incurs shortcomings that undermine individuals in relation to their human rights.
It is vital to note that life is precious to each individual.
Unfortunately, death penalty does not support this perspective. Aspects such as social unrest and physical dilemma that is imposed on friends and family members of the accused person are beyond understanding (Donohue John and Justin 79). Based on the view of relatives, killing the person they love doesn’t serve as a manner of granting effective justice. In regard to economic or political perception, a renowned individual in the society has power to influence the case.
In regard to economic perspective, individuals who are of low status in the economy will not be in a position to afford such services. This situation that incorporates the gap between the rich and the poor can render individuals to biased judgement. Due to this factor, families involved suffer a lot. This is because at times, the accused individual may later turn out to be innocent after execution. After analysing such issues, critics should not advocate for capital punishment in the community.
Donohue III, John J., and Justin Wolfers. Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. No. w11982. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2006.
Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. “Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? Acts, Omissions, and Life-Life Tradeoffs.” Stanford Law Review (2005): 703-750.
Would you like to get help with academic papers like term papers, research papers, essays and dissertations? We offer professional academic writing services while posting free essays online like the above Criminal Justice: Coursework on Death Penalty. If you are interested in any of the services that we offer, contact us now or visit our homepage for more details of our services. You can also read non-related materials and academic paper writing guidelines as well as academic paper samples in different disciplines here.