Criminal Justice Paper on Conduct Becoming

Criminal Justice Paper on Conduct Becoming

Consider my decision to search the residence for the fugitive. What is your opinion?

I would have conducted a systematic search of the home after considering all the circumstances. It is important to preserve the safety of the public and build their trust with the police through investigating every detail of the case. Considering that I had limited personnel at my disposal and that the suspect was near the residence, I would secure the area with the available patrol officers (Lassiter & Meissner, 2010).I would then seek for aerial support with the Forward Looking Infrared, then start searching house by house. I would have begun from the last known location and then move outward from the site. I cannot hold you liable for your actions because, in my opinion, you made the best decision based on the available resources and information.

Do you conduct yourselves as if you are on video at all times? Have you done things that you would not do in front of your grandmother? Why?

I believe that people should conduct themselves in a way as if they were under high surveillance. Thirteen states in the US prohibit citizens from recording the police even at their place of residence. These countries need to amend their laws to eliminate the concerns of abuse of power. More evidence about what has transpired can be obtained by allowing citizens to record with the police. Mishra (2008) claims that if the citizens are allowed to record with the police, all the police officers would have the incentive to behave well at all times. Moreover, citizen’s evidence provides information on other potential suspects that may be involved in the case. It would also provide information about officers who might have violated the rule of law when performing their duties. I do not have any issue with civilians recording my actions provided it does not obstruct an investigation (Goodman, 2008). As a law enforcement official in the United States Air force, I have never done anything that violates the rights of people, much less anything that would dishonor my family or my dignity. This is because I hold myself with a high degree of integrity and dignity. I do not fear to face the truth and accounting for all my actions. Without integrity, an officer cannot perform his responsibilities in a fair and neutral way.

Dilemma 7

I would use the power given to me by the rule of law when interrogating the suspect. After creating an understanding with the suspect, I would ask him open-ended questions on the whereabouts of the abducted girl. I would record every statement that he makes and observe how he reacts to some issues. Furthermore, I would make the suspect believe that I have enough evidence to prove that he is guilty to compel him or her to provide any relevant information regarding the case (Lassiter & Meissner, 2010). For instance, I would tell the suspect that there is an eyewitness who had provided evidence against him. I believe that application of deception during an examination is within the ethical boundaries of the enforcing law. Furthermore, the United States Supreme Court has allowed the use of deceptive tactics during the interrogation of a suspect. Some judges view this tactic as coercive but believe that they are important to get prompt, truthful confessions by the suspects. I think that deceptive tactic would help obtain trustworthy information about the location of the abducted girl.

 

 

References

Goodman, D. J. (2008). Enforcing ethics: A scenario-based workbook for police and corrections recruits and officers. Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Lassiter, G., & Meissner, C. A. (2010). Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations. American Psychological Association.