Criminal Justice Paper on Future Human- Wearable Technology

Criminal Justice Paper on Future Human- Wearable Technology


The 21st century is well known to be the technological era marked by the use of high-end technologies to aid in solving problems today. However, there is infrequently new technology but an improvement of what already exists. The most sorted out technology currently is famously known as ‘wearable’, which is a concept first used in 1975 after Pulsar invented the calculator watch. The term wearable refers to a technology mostly electrical that has been innovated so that it can be either worn or become portable to the user suggesting a leap in functionality from its predecessor. The most notable wearables known today are breathing and heart rate monitors, wristbands that have the ability to monitor a number of activities as well as cameras that record clips from the point of view of the wearer. Within the criminal justice systems, the wearables that have been used for a considerable number of years have been in-car cameras that have been currently transformed to body wearable over the last few years a factor that has triggered a number of individuals to request for more technologies in law enforcing.


According to Liu and Ken (56), wearable technology does not only mean gadgets that are actually worn but also what can be carried around or used as a tool to perform tasks that once done manually with no automation. The current situation of using wearable technology in the criminal justice system is based on reducing the critics based on false officer as well as witness accounts about a criminal act. Numerous individuals have been cited through the criminal justice history stating they had been wrongly arrested stating officers cheating under oath, in reaction to this, companies such as VIEVU as well as Taser with their products the LE-series body-worn video and audio recording gadget and the AXON Flex which is an eyewear-mounted video device (Bruno, 77). These devices have hit the market helping record criminal incidences that have aided the courts pass judgment based on evidence some of these evidence is based on both officer and eyewitness accounts. The devices mentioned above are not new technologies of the 21st century but innovations that have been developed out of function. The idea of using video evidence has been in existence for several years now but this was based on car-mounted cameras that were highly inflexible. In several cases, though the camera was active the clips retrieved did not get the criminal acts in full as some incidences were never in view of the cameras. The AXON Flex as well as LE-series body-worn devices are carry on and record what the officer is going through aiding in improving the criminal justice.

Technology does not only bring new solutions but also innovative options. In a case in late April 2014 where a family owned business building was burnt to a shell and the family as well as the insurance company wanted to know the cause of the fire. The structure due to lack of integrity caused significant risk to investigators; however, after employing the use of unmanned robotics both parties were able to find the true sources of the inferno (Sieja, 24). From this information, it is evident that technological advancement used in criminal justice does not have to be body carry on technology but also portable machinery that once considered impossible to have in crime investigation.

The ideology as well as the movement of using wearable technology has not only taken shape but manufactures re coming up with more creative innovations that are gaining significant acceptance, however, perfection has still to be achieved. Currently the most sorted after wearable is the Google Glass which is a futuristic gadget that consists of voice activated Bluetooth as well as Wi-Fi connection that allows the user to multitask in a variety of tasks and has been bought by a number of police departments to aid enforcement. Despite this advancement, a California Highway Patrol clearly indicated the increased challenge to concentrate on the monitor visible to user as well as other functions such as driving (Holt and Adam, 112).

The technocrats at google suggested a solution of only offering audio services during such a scenario; however, this was called I question considering the statistics showing the decrease in concentration when using a mobile phone while driving. The best stand in solution is using the glasses as car cameras while driving and taking them as a wearable when in a non-motorized pursuit. DeKeseredy and Molly (67) indicated that in the inferno case the cost of employing the use of the robot was significantly expensive a factor similarly cited by the NYPD in acquiring the google glasses. This would subsequently suggest development of reasonably priced intuitively designed gadgets.

In conclusion, technological advancements have filled he 21st century nonetheless according to a number of researches have shown that the technologies enjoyed today are not new but reinvented. In the criminal justice system, technologies have been questionable due to ineffectiveness for instance the car-mounted camera is inflexible and cannot be used in non-motorized pursuits. In response to this, gadgets such as The AXON Flex as well as LE-series body-worn devices have been adopted showing the future of wearable technology in criminal justice being highly useful. The google glass is another wearable device currently being adopted into various police departments however it has considerable glitches that have not been solved this consequently showing the need for more research to introduce technology into the police department. On the other hand, robotics has gained their way in forensics reducing personnel risks. In summary, a number of new technologies are being developed and soon evidence analysis as well as other factors will soon be accessed through wearable devices.


Works Cited

Bruno, Tom. Wearable Technology: Smart Watches to Google Glass for Libraries. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2015. Print.

DeKeseredy, Walter S., and Molly Dragiewicz, eds. Handbook of critical criminology. London: Routledge, 2011.

Holt, Thomas J, and Adam M. Bossler. Cybercrime in Progress: Theory and Prevention of Technology-Enabled Offenses. London: Routledge, 2016.

Liu, Cixin, and Ken Liu. The Three-Body Problem. New York: Tor Books, 2014.

Sieja, Glenn.  Robots Lead the Way for Investigations. Claims Magazine, 2015.