Legal Rights of an Employer and the Employees
Jacob’s assertion that the company infringed his rights does not have basis and advantage in law. Employing as well as sacking of workers are the duties of the manager. This duty cannot be moved to the workers. Nevertheless, the sacking procedure of a worker need to be just, unbiased and in line with the imperative policies, rules and laws. The worker instead has the right to go against the decisions of the firm in the court of law or any organ that solves disputes. These bodies have the choice of figuring out whether the worker’s rights were infringed by the firm. When it comes to Jacob’s instance, the law backs the firm. Jacob as a worker of Crane Hardware Stores had to read as well as put up with the provisions of the corporation’s policy on emails and the internet.
Essentially, these policies are compulsory. They are not altered to fit individuals impacted by them. Rather, there are effects for not sticking to them. Cranes policy on emails apparently contends that email account is an asset of the company and the corporation has the right to observe as well as reclaim any data stored in it. The policy as well brings out the effects for not sticking by its provisions. These incorporates termination of the job. Jacob went against this policy by utilizing the email given to him by the firm to send private messages attached with sexual feelings. It is perceived as the opinion of this paper that Crane’s email as well as internet policies are in accordance with other corporation’s policies. Majority of corporation offer email account to workers for roles of enabling communication and handling the corporation’s trade. As a result, it cannot be contended that these policies were discriminatory.
Jacob missed the chance to resolve the issue when he was called by the HRM. Rather than agreeing to his mistake, 
he opted to defend his actions. This clarified that he was not set to stick by the provisions of the policy. As a result, he was sacked. Whether his firing was right or mistaken can only be verified in the court. Nevertheless, the court of law will considerably refer to the policies of the company. As it is, the ruling will back the firm. Jacob can only utilize the principle of fair ruling to overturn their verdict. Nevertheless, the finest and affordable means of resolving this issue is agreeing to Alternative Dispute Resolutions. He may lose his job, but be remunerated. Going for the court pathway is good for justice. But it is expensive and dangerous.
Rights have restrictions. An individual has to be set to be responsible for exercising his or her rights. Even when it comes to most liberal communities in the globe, rights and responsibilities are one thing. Vast rights leads to rebellion. It is the responsibility of the government to make sure that people stick to set laws. While the government has to respect ones rights when enacting law, Jacob is off the mark to decline working with State Trooper. It is the duty of the Trooper to stop him as well as ask him to go through Breathalyzer Test. The officer might have figured out that he was driving carelessly and under the effect of drugs. His deeds were a threat to the lives of other people using the road. He fails to keep in mind the effects of impaired driving. He is not aware of his drug problem also. In such situations, it is quite hard to settle that Jacob’s rights were infringed by the State Troopers.
Brianna finds herself in the wrong side of law when she gives wrongful data on Jacob to an agent of Rowe’s Home Supply. She alludes to a drug case which is a lie. She is legally responsible for defamation. Drug case is a threatening problem in many job settings. Through connecting Jacob to drug issues, she has entirely ruined any openings available for Jacob to join Howe. It will be a challenge for him to get a job in reliable companies. Majority of these corporation need referees from earlier place of work. In contrast, Brianna has not committed any wrongdoing by alerting Howe agents that Jacob’s job termination was a wrongful one. Exceptional HRM practices require sharing of factual and right data about workers’ without infringing the confidentiality of the worker. Every worker has a responsibility to safeguard his or her status in any company. No company will lie about a worker in fear that he or she might not be hired.
Lucy infringed intellectual assets laws. These laws identify the rights of an asset owner to ascertain how the property ought to be utilized as well as shared (Landes & Posner, 2003). These rights are vastly treasured by technological corporations that incorporate Microsoft, Intel, Apple, Google as well as Yahoo. The safeguards their inventions from being faked by other corporations. As a result, these organization have go on to succeed in their endeavors. Ann does not appreciate the effects of infringement of intellectual property law. She is possibly not well-versed with Apple versus Samsung incident as well as how a lot of money has been used in legal process. She inconsiderately infringes these laws as she is of the idea that all material in the net is fair game, and ought to be utilized in line with fair policy. The factual stand is that the material on the sites are owned by publishers who have the liberty to describe how they are used. She may be in trouble if she runs into legal issues if she goes on to bring in pictures from other websites to the corporation’s website. The best ways of shunning infringement of assert rights is to utilize the only material under General User License also referred to as open source. Ann can as well ask for permission from the publishers prior to utilizing the images.
For Jacob to build a blog so as to taint the status of Crane is both ethically and lawfully wrong. Despite having genuine claims against crane and its leadership, the law fails to let him undertake slur promotions against the corporation. In its place, he ought to pursue the matter with significant authorities. Jack is quite bitter about being fired. This resentment has made it hard for him to fathom the effects of his destructive internet campaigns against Crane. The bosses can take legal action against him for defamation which can led to huge remuneration as well as imprisonment. He is infringing the confidentiality of the executives and their households too. He as well surfaces as an individual with doubtful ethical personality. Jacob put an appearance of an individual who is untrustworthy by managers. Workers have the duty to maintain firm’s secrets even after being fired. This the motive why corporation ask workers to sign privacy contract prior to commencing their routines. Jacob’s undertakings can fully impact the productivity of a corporation that hires many other citizens. It is quite irresponsible for Jacob to go on operating a blog to damage the status of Crane Hardware Stores.
The sample above showcases how a winning essay paper should be crafted. At PremiumEssays.net, we can always help you with essay papers for all subjects with a guarantee of only authentic top notch papers. Simply talk to us in order to get yours at your own convenience.
Reference
Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (2003). The economic structure of intellectual property law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.