Political Science Research Paper on Hillary Clinton against TPP trade

Hillary Clinton against TPP Trade Deal

The paper discusses the policy and politics associated with the recently signed TPP trade deal as well as examining Clinton’s opposition to the 12-nation transpacific partnership. Clinton argued that the new trade pact does not address the currency manipulation problems. Clinton has also received strong support from trade unions across the country, who argues that the deal would lead to the loss of millions of American jobs to foreign nations. The trade pact is a key part of the Obama’s administration legacies, which are pivotal to improved relations with Asian countries. If the U. S Congress approves the deal, it would lower tariffs and expand trade with close to 40 per cent of the global economy (Frizell, para. 3-5). Clinton also emphasized that she was against the deal from inception, as it would lower the level of returns of the American factories and empty American pockets. The opposition to the deal seems to be aligned to her campaigning policies, including increasing American jobs, raising the minimum wages, and protection of the U.S national security.

Apart from this, the relationship between Japan and the U.S remains tight. The U.S-Japan relationship has grown into a global spectrum due to their collaboration in science and technology. Economically, Japan has contributed to expansive financial support to U.S-Japan diplomatic programs (Helper and Mari 127). Japan accounts for one of the largest markets of the U.S products such as chemical and films. On the other hand, United States has directly invested in finance and insurance sectors in Japan. Therefore, the transpacific partnership (TPP) agreement is evidence of the international economic cooperation between Japan and U.S.

However, the recently signed trade agreement should be amended to be made on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal to make it effective. The deal proposed the incorporation of free trade, transparency, and integration of global countries into a common business.  The U.S is also making strong efforts to reduce the cases of money fluctuations caused by foreign countries.  The deal would lead to the manipulation of the currency enforcement policy, the impact of TPP on the working American population, and the benefits formulated to accrue on the pharmaceutical firms. The opposition of the trade deal by the labor unions was aimed at reducing the exposure of the American economy into steep competition with competitors such as Japan.

It is important to understand the implications of the policy and the trade negotiations with the Asian Countries. The U.S has benefited significantly from the trade relations with its Asian partners including Japan and China.  Previous trade deals such as NAFTA that were well tailored and programmed, but that, due to lack of credibility, resulted in total failure. Instead, they ended up costing the American workers jobs. Due to her logical analysis of the experience on the performance of the American economy, the success of this trade deal was unlikely. Instead, it is better for the country to intensify its involvement in bilateral trade and regional trade. The trade deal was later forced into practice under the influence of President Obama, and Clinton was unhappy about it. She believed that the trade deal in its original state was just subjecting the American people to adverse external environmental conditions.

The reason behind this argument was because such trade arrangements were easily manageable and could result in the quick actualization of the country’s strategic goals and plans without much constraint. As an experienced leader in American politics, Clinton believed that the persistent move towards implementation of the TPP trade move was not genuine. She believed it was based on particular people’s interests at the cost of exposing the innocent American population to unforeseen uncertainties.

 

Works cited

Helper, Susan, and Mari Sake. “Supplier relations in Japan and the United States: are they converging?.” Sloan Management Review (2012).

Frizell, Sam. Hillary Clinton opposes trans-pacific partnership, 7 Oct., 2015. Web. 10 Oct.2015. <http://time.com/4065320/hillary-clinton-opposes-trans-pacific-partnership/>.