Sample Business Paper on If Brexit is an appropriate solution for the problems being faced by the UK

Most people and officials in the UK believed that by withdrawing their membership from the EU partnership, most of the issues that face their economic status might be solved. Being a member of the EU partnership had made the country to have slow growth and negative relations with most states according to the study conducted by Currie, O’Brien, & Yonge (2017). Therefore, Brexit remains to be one of the appropriate solutions for the issues being faced by the UK.  There was a belief that through Brexit, the UK will be able to correct every menace that had affected its economic, political, social, and environmental status. Besides, authorities in the UK had the greatest believe that through the withdrawal of their membership, their issues might be resolved as they will not be expecting to get a go-ahead in making different operations (Currie, O’Brien, & Yonge, 2017). The idea of choosing Brexit is appropriate as it can aid authorities of the UK to solve different problems by diverting the subscription fee of membership that they use to pay for their involvement in the EU membership to offer immersed support other developmental projects. Brexit is appropriate as would be able to help the region to be able to be free from operating under broad laws that were undemocratic along with infringed on the sovereignty within its parliament (Sampson, 2017). Besides, Brexit is appropriate solution for different problems facing the UK as it would help in increasing the approaches that the UK can use to resolve its employment crisis by ensuring that most citizens are able to get into their markets without any special law barring them away from operating. Brexit is also an appropriate solution for the problems facing the UK as it allows the UK authority can be competent in ensuring that every individual that gets hired first in different organizations is locals but not immigrants (Priest, 2017). Hence, the movement of Brexit has been perceived by several locals within the UK to be the appropriate solution for different problems facing the existence and development of the UK as it aid in ensuring equity in employment distribution among the locals.

Problems that have caused the movement towards Brexit

For an extended duration, history of Britain differs from that of its European neighbors. The differences made politicians sow the seeds for Brexit by blaming the European Union (EU) for problems over which the bloc consists of little control. The little authority existed while building the economy dependent on foreign labor. Brexit exit was mainly referred to like the idea of the United Kingdom leaving the EU (Kostadinova, 2017). The movement towards Brexit was caused primarily by the opinion that the European Union threats British control, and the EU was considered to be suppressing the United Kingdom (UK) in heavy regulations. The other reason for Brexit was because the EU embeds corporate welfare and prevents radical transformations. Besides, the EU was considered an ideal idea, although the euro was supposed to be a disaster (Bakker, 2017). Furthermore, the ability of the UK to have the capacity to maintain the money it presently sends to the EU remains a cause for Brexit. Other significant causes included:-

EU was considered to be a basically protectionist business bloc

Big trade lobbies Brussels for additional directives to create it tougher for small organizations to go into the marketplace and contest. The EU liberally admits that its ‘preventive idea.’ This principle hinders innovation in sciences of life and the sector of technology that was utilized as masked protectionism (Herbert, 2017). Besides, the alliance of customs that every member state of the EU belongs imposes more than thirteen thousand tariffs on imported goods. As a result, the customers were required to pay an average of seventeen percent above global charges on food. Moreover, the UK, in specific, has witnessed a minimal economic advantage from the solitary market. The little interest remained to be another cause of movement towards Brexit (Kokotovic & Kurecic, 2016). Above every aspect, the EU was considered to have weaponized trade. Additionally, free-born individuals in the EU are prohibited from moving into voluntary accords of business with any individual who are not members of the EU without the permission of unelected officials in Brussels (Kundera, 2017). However, looking to attain such approval might take several individual years to get, which the UK considered being a waste of time during business while collaborating with other states within the EU.

EU was considered to be involved in the severe misallocation of resources

When considering the idea of taking the EU budget, fort percent taken to different farmers, frequently to the wealthiest farmers with massive track of farms. Nevertheless, agricultural activities account for just one percent of gross domestic product (GDP) crosswise the EU (Stua, 2019). The standard strategy of agriculture promotes overproduction. In the past, the states within the union used to have Butter Mountains and wine lakes. However, they currently have surplus production being dumped in the marketplace within the overseas (Curry, 2016). A present instance is the discarding of tomatoes that are tinned in Africa, in specific Ghana, that result in a important alteration to the local marketplace together with the decrease in the profits of tomato farmers within Ghana. Such instances of misallocation of resources remained to be the other cause that led to movement of Brexit.

EU was considered to be a political plan that was vitally anti-democratic

The UK leaders were not pleased with the idea that the whole range of European leaders made it abundantly apparent that every European nation had to be directed towards the great state without their individuals tolerating what is taking place (Priest, 2017). The leader from the UK considered that the idea could be the successive step that masked as having the financial function, but which might ultimately and forever lead to the alliance. To the UK, there could be no self-governing choice against the accords of European (Marsh, 2018). There was the need to have a double democracy in the EU, but in reality, the EU was managed by the unelected officials of the European Commission that flow rings around different ministers from state authorities together with EU parliamentarians. Therefore such instances of EU being political form the basis of the movement of Brexit.

EU has involuntarily encouraged regional separatist alliances to craft in the number of associate states

It was falsely believed that places within the UK could turn out to be ‘independent’ associates of the EU with the chair at the pinnacle of table. Present instances are Catalonia, Corsica, as well as Scotland. Other individuals contended that the EU in secret welcomes such disintegration of the country-state so that it can focus even extra authority within Brussels (Curry, 2016). It specifically favors to converse on the Europe of the states instead of nation-states of Europe. In the past, people within the EU were prepared to defend their families together with their countries. However, in the present-day, the EU expects individuals to be in debt the superior devotion to Europe that necessarily means staying ready to fight to guard the gold being ready to contest to protect gold-planed pensions of Brussels officials (Warrell, 2019). Such ideas made the EU to be termed to encourage regional separatist movements in developing several member states that remain as a significant cause that form the progress of Brexit.

Why the UK choose Brexit as a means to solve its problems

The need to strengthen anti-immigration parties through the region was one of the reasons as to why the UK chooses Brexit as a means of solving its problems. The UK authorities believed that by moving to Brexit, their issues might be resolved as they will not be expecting to get a go-ahead in making different operations (Currie, O’Brien, & Yonge, 2017). The idea of choosing Brexit was to help the UK to solve its problems as the authority was able to use the high fees that they were paying for the EU membership to support other developmental projects. The UK knew that the movement would be able to help the region to be able to be free from operating under broad laws that were undemocratic along with infringed on the sovereignty within its parliament (Sampson, 2017). Hence, the movement of Brexit has been perceived by several locals within the UK to be of great importance in ensuring equity in employment distribution among the locals.

Cutting government spending

Several individuals that supported the pulling out of the UK from the EU had the perception that the idea might help in reducing the expenditure of the government. Besides, supporters of Brexit argued that ending net contributors to the EU would allow for cutting tax or reducing government spending (Kundera, 2017). The idea was chosen to help the UK in help authorities in the region to reduce government expenditures. The government suggested that approach would helped ensuring that they do not pay high fees to continue being in the EU as they had been doing previously before their withdrawal from the union. The UK aimed to resolve its problem of using individual tax to pay for subscriptions to the union (Cavlak, 2019). Hence, UK authority choose Brexit to helped them to have an appropriate budget with the money that they might have used in paying for a subscription in supporting different unions set in place to fight cases of immigration.

Appropriate allocation of resources

The UK authority had the problem with the EU leaders that they were misallocating resources. Therefore, the movement of Brexit was chosen to help the UK has to ensure that they resolve the issue of misallocations of funds for different organizations (Kostadinova, 2017). For instance, the UK citizens had the belief that the movement would e appropriate in ensuring that every department receives the resources and funds as per their budget. The region choose the idea to help it in resolving the issue of allocating more funds to wealthy farmers with large farms while ensuring that every needy farmer gets resource allocation as per their needs. Brexit was the best idea of ensuring that the agricultural department discourages the issue of overproduction as it had been when they were within the EU. Additionally, the idea to choose refit has enabled the UK to resolve the problem of distortion (Nakamura, Yamada, & Tan, 2019). The region had ensured that there is no dumping of different crops as it had been in the case when they were in the EU. The idea has dramatically helped in eliminating situations of significant distortion to the local market as well as the reduction in the income of farmers from different countries.

Decrease cases of massive corruption in the region

The instances of massive fraud that had been reported in operations of the EU were a major reason why the UK chose Brexit as a way to escape such cases of fraud. The EU’s financial records have not been permitted for the past twenty years with the chief financial assessor of the union in admiration of around one hundred billion Euros of expenditures (Kundera, 2017). Cases of missing reports and accounts for different funds for the union is another reason as to why the UK choose Brexit to solve its problem of ensuring that it operates with accountability. The UK wanted to move from a high-risk strategy to enable it to advance its economic, social, and political operations.

Suitability and appropriateness of a Brexit with or without a deal with the EU and whether or whether not the United Kingdom is likely to succeed in achieving its purpose through either process

Due to several reasons that caused call for a movement of Brexit, the UK is likely to succeed in attaining its purpose without being involved within the EU. The EU had widely been put to be responsible for the anxiety among Russia along with Ukraine. Hence, Brexit is essential in ensuring that the UK remains to be suitable and appropriate in its operations (Herbert, 2017). The UK can use the movement of Brexit in improving its relations with countries that have tension caused by the EU. The UK can then use its exit from the EU in ensuring that it expands its trading partners with the countries that have negatively been affected by the EU. Besides, the UK is likely to succeed as it could create significant environmental governance gaps (Simionescu, Bilan, Smrcka, & Vincúrová, 2017). For instance, Brexit can help the UK to develop a different policy cycle that includes developing policy, providing expertise and collecting data, monitoring, implementation, and enforcing various regulations to improve environmental wellbeing. The idea of the movement of Brexit can help the UK to benefit from being capable of drawing upon expertise from the European Environmental Agency together with European Chemicals Agencies to improve in their operations (Tetlow & Jackson, 2018). Such repositories of knowledge, along with innovation readily available after Brexit, can help in improving the services of environmentalists and business players within the UK.

Lessons for other countries

It has been evident from different reports that Brexit will make Britain take several years to recover. For instance, Henry VIII’s initial Brexit, following his one thousand five hundred and thirty-four schisms with the Roman Catholic Church, was not fully resolved until the Glorious Revolution of 1689 with the civil conflict. The same experience has been termed by many to relate with the same case of Brexit (Taylor-Gooby, 2017). The significant lessons that can be cleared by other countries include strategic, legal, political, and accessible. Some of the strategic experiences are apparent. Other European countries need the British to engage severely in defense of Europe. Nevertheless, they are all going to have to pretend that they have inflicted no such kind of defeat on Britain (Sandbu, 2017). Other countries can learn that not even the leading global authority has managed to depart the EU on anything likes its terms. It is presently apparent that the EU crossed the Rubicon some moment ago amid free association of democracies around Brussels and Berlin (Kohnert, 2018). Brexit reveals to other countries that European polities and economies are deeply integrated since Britain joined the then European Community.



Bakker, M. (2017). Brexit-Court of Brexit-Kamer?. Advocatenblad, 97(5), 45-45. doi: 10.5553/ab/0165-13312017097005015

Cavlak, H. (2019). The cost of brexit: Neo-functionalism strikes back. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 19(1), 65-78. Retrieved from

Currie, S., O’Brien, J., & Yonge, W. (2017). EU update: The latest developments on brexit, MAR, and MiFID II. The Investment Lawyer, 24(1), 30-40. Retrieved from

Curry, S. (2016). Brexit: scientific responses have to be personal and political. Matters. doi: 10.19185/matters.147743414521

Herbert, A. (2017). Brexit should not mean Brexit for cytopathology. Cytopathology, 28(4), 337-338. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12439

Kohnert, D. (2018). L’ Angleterre, le Brexit et l’Afrique (England, der Brexit und Afrika) (England, Brexit and Africa). SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3280579

Kokotovic, F., & Kurecic, P. (2016). The Case Of Brexit: An Analysis Of The Political And Economic Factors. Varazdin: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency (VADEA). Retrieved from

Kostadinova, V. (2017). Brexit is Unlikely to Provide Answers to Governance Problems Under Globalisation. Economic Affairs, 37(1), 135-140. doi: 10.1111/ecaf.12219

Kundera, J. (2017). BREXIT. Ekonomia XXI Wieku, 2(14), 56-72. doi: 10.15611/e21.2017.2.04

Marsh, D. (2018). Brexit and the politics of truth. British Politics, 13(1), 79-89. doi:

Nakamura, K., Yamada, T., & Tan, K. H. (2019). The impact of brexit on designing a material-based global supply chain network for asian manufacturers. Management of Environmental Quality, 30(5), 980-1000. doi:

Priest, J. (2017). Why the post-Brexit UK market research industry needs to consolidate. Research World, 2017(67), 33-35. doi: 10.1002/rwm3.20594

Sampson, T. (2017). Brexit: The economics of international disintegration. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(4), 163-184. doi:

Sandbu, M. (2017). How to solve the irish brexit problem. FT.Com, Retrieved from