OPER1160 – Marking Guide for Group Project Team:
Mark | Comments | |
a) Formatting (3 marks)
· Title page included · Report body contains-Introduction, Four Questions with Headings, Conclusion, Header/Footer with pg. # & topic, and a copy of this Marking Guide. · Tables and charts are used effectively & correctly in the body of the report. · 12 font – Calibri with 1” margins, 1 or 1.15 spacing · maximum of 6 pages of body, including charts but not the Bibliography or title page
|
/3 |
|
b) Contract, Progress Report and Log Book (8 marks)
· Completed the contract and progress report and turned it in on time · Filled in the log book and attached it to the project · if required, progressive conflict resolution was performed in a professional manner utilizing the log book and contract guideline
|
/8 |
|
c) Peer Evaluation (4 marks)
· rating done for each person on each criteria factor · explanation of two best things and two things needing improvements · percentages assigned add up to 100% or less · no one person exceeds the max. allowed · all must approve before it can be marked · if this part is handed in late but still in same calendar day, zero for this part. If later, zero for paper. · attach at the back of the paper
|
/4 |
|
1) Analysis
a) Costs Comparison (3 marks) · calculations done and work shown to justify costs · totals and conclusion clearly stated for the reader
|
/3 |
|
b) Four Performance Dimensions or Criteria
(12 marks – 3 marks for each) · four additional choices of criteria, justified by your research · did NOT include cost as one of these criteria c) Relative Weighting and Matrix (12 marks) · explained how you decided on relative weighting of all five criteria (4 + cost) (4 marks) · explained how you ranked each company for your criteria (4 marks) · utilized weighted matrix model properly to evaluate the two choices (3 marks) · chart embedded, labeled, titled and referred to in paragraph prior to the chart (1 mark) |
/12
/12
|
|
Mark | Comments | |
2) Stated Final Recommendation (4 marks)
· clearly stated decision · gave summarized reasoning from analysis in 2) above |
/4
|
|
3) Benchmarking Performance Measures
(8 marks – 2 marks for each one) · recommended specific measurement(s) for each criteria selected in 2) above · included reasons for choice · was specific |
/8 |
|
Proofing – spelling, grammar, plagiarism – (up to 12 marks off)
· Must use plagiarism software provided in the Group Project Drop Box. No need to attach the Turn-It-In report, but if no Project final report in the Dropbox by the due date and time, marks deducted and you must submit before the Project will be marked. · |
|
|
d) Research done and Bibliography Created (4 marks) · Minimum of one article per team member · references done in APA format · looking for database references over articles extracted from internet sites.
e) In-text Citations (2 marks) · APA format · built credibility
|
/4
/2 |
|
Total /60
|
Comments by Profes