Sample Business Studies Case Study on progressive conflict resolution

OPER1160 – Marking Guide for Group Project   Team:

  Mark Comments
a) Formatting (3 marks)

·        Title page included

·        Report body contains-Introduction, Four Questions with Headings, Conclusion, Header/Footer with pg. # & topic, and a copy of this Marking Guide.

·        Tables and charts are used effectively & correctly in the body of the report.

·        12 font – Calibri  with 1” margins, 1 or 1.15 spacing

·        maximum of 6 pages of body, including charts but not the Bibliography or title page

 

 

/3

 
b)  Contract, Progress Report and Log Book (8 marks)

·  Completed the contract and progress report and turned it in on time

·  Filled in the log book and attached it to the project

·  if required, progressive conflict resolution was performed in a professional manner utilizing the log book and contract guideline

 

 

/8

 

 

 

 

 

c) Peer Evaluation (4 marks)

·  rating done for each person on each criteria factor

·  explanation of two best things and two things needing improvements

·  percentages assigned add up to 100% or less

·  no one person exceeds the max. allowed

·  all must approve before it can be marked

·  if this part is handed in late but still in same calendar day, zero for this part.  If later, zero for paper.

·  attach at the back of the paper

 

 

/4

 
 
1) Analysis

a) Costs Comparison (3 marks)

·  calculations done and work shown to justify costs

·  totals and conclusion clearly stated for the reader

 

 

/3

 
b) Four Performance Dimensions or Criteria

(12 marks – 3 marks for each)

·  four additional choices of criteria,  justified by your research

·  did  NOT include cost as one of these criteria

c) Relative Weighting and Matrix (12 marks)

·  explained how you decided on relative weighting of all five criteria (4 + cost)  (4 marks)

·  explained how you ranked each company for your criteria (4 marks)

·  utilized weighted matrix model properly to evaluate the two choices (3 marks)

·  chart embedded, labeled, titled and referred to in

paragraph prior to the chart (1 mark)

 

/12

 

 

 

 

/12

 

 
  Mark Comments
2) Stated Final Recommendation (4 marks)

·  clearly stated decision

·  gave summarized reasoning from analysis in 2) above

 

/4

 

 

 

 
3) Benchmarking Performance Measures

(8 marks – 2 marks for each one)

·   recommended specific measurement(s) for each criteria selected in 2) above

·   included reasons for choice

·  was specific

 

 

/8

 
Proofing – spelling, grammar, plagiarism – (up to 12 marks off)

·        Must use plagiarism software provided in the Group Project Drop Box.  No need to attach the Turn-It-In report, but if no Project final report in the Dropbox by the due date and time, marks deducted and you must submit before the Project will be marked.

·        

 

 

 
d) Research done and Bibliography Created
(4 marks)

·  Minimum of one article per team member

·  references done in APA format

·  looking for database references over articles extracted from internet sites.

 

e) In-text Citations (2 marks)

·  APA format

·  built credibility

 

/4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/2

 
 

Total                                                              /60                    

 

 

Comments by Profes