Sample Criminal Justice Paper on Terrorism’s Future Potentialities

Terrorism and acts of terror are not a new phenomenon on the soil of the United States of America or humanity at large. These acts remain the greatest vice that threatens the Americans’ peace, as Homeland Security attempts to update itself with the current terrorism trends and come up with counterterrorism measures. However, some of the strategies being fronted by the government of the United States have proven to be abortive.US has taken a hard stance by enacting numerous legislations aimed at protecting itself, including putting in place the famous “U.S. does not negotiate with terrorists” slogan (Czinkota & Knight 2005). Furthermore, the U.S. has put economic sanctions on countries deemed donors or sympathizers of terrorists and executed terrorists. To counter the ever-upgrading terrorists’ tactics, Homeland Security, and other relevant bodies in charge of security should review their strategies and be ahead of the terror masterminds (Hoffman, 2002).

Understanding how terrorists operate is the best way to prepare for and destroy them. Terrorism is a highly dynamic concept that will forever keep on changing with upgraded tactics and new actors. If terrorists do not upgrade their tactics and structure, they will likely be destroyed by the U.S. forces or even isolated (Uwazie, Noble, Getty, & Valadez, 2019). Although the aim of terrorism is meting violence on the victims, terrorists will come up with new tactical trends and more sophisticated strategies. As the terrorists up to their game, so should Homeland Security and other relevant body in the U.S.

Although criminal and terror networks might not belong to a common front, they are likely to intersect in the future. While terrorists would want to cause instability and harm innocent citizens, criminals hold their hopes onto government stability to operate successfully. Cyberterrorism may not have reached its peak yet, but the U.S. is still very vulnerable to any form of terror attack. Homegrown terrorists will carry out some of the attacks that might be meted against the U.S., while larger attacks will be executed by large organizations with comprehensive network and logistical support (Uwazie et al., 2019). Furthermore, while the future of radicalization remains questionable, at least the path will change. Accordingly, the Department of Homeland Security should innovate new strategies and not just law enforcement techniques. Technology can be employed as an alternative. Generally, Homeland Security should do things differently to cope with the future of terrorism.

Terrorism groups like Al Qaeda that heavily rely on Muslim ideology as a conduit pipe to win sympathy will face the challenge of sustaining the ideologies. Today, most Jihadist communities feel threatened by Muslims and non-Muslims who do not want to be associated with the Jihadist’s philosophy (Uwazie et al., 2019). The acceptance of Jihadist philosophy would boost the morale of terrorists as they seek to disrupt their targets normal way of life. The Jihadist philosophy has existed for many years, and it is likely to continue to drive the course of terrorist networks like Al Qaeda and ISIS in the future. That said, fighting terrorism is more of taking troops to the terrorists’ territories and destroy them. Everyone must be actively involved to combat terrorism.

Homeland Security should invent new strategies and tactics if the war on terrorisms is to be won. The fight should start by understanding how terrorists work. However, it is worth noting that terrorists are changing their tactics and strategies every day to remain relevant. While cyberterrorism is still growing, terrorists are likely to continue launching attacks. Most of the smaller attacks will be carried out by homegrown terrorists, while the major ones will be done by larger organizations that are more organized logistically. Lastly, just like in the past, the Jihadist philosophy will be exploited by terrorists as they seek to disrupt people’s normal way of life (Hoffman, 2002). Therefore, Homeland Security should assume a sober and holistic approach while dealing with terrorism because winning this war is more of using the military or force.



Czinkota, M., & Knight, G. (2005). Managing the terrorist threat. In European Business Forum (No. 20).

Hoffman, B. (2002). Rethinking terrorism and counterterrorism since 9/11. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism25(5), 303-316.

Uwazie, E., Noble, J., Getty, R., & Valadez, M. (2019). Critical Issues in Criminal Justice: Historical Perspectives. Cognella Academic Publishing.