Sample Ethics Essays on Speciesism


The systematic contemplation of human-animal relationship has significantly spread in the public domain in the recent years. Speciesist is a word that was introduced in the 1970s to represent human associations with animals and draw a contrast with different modes of unjustified discrimination, such as racism (Caviola, Jim & Nadira, 2018). As stipulated by Singer (1977), speciesism is the uneven consideration of animals’ welfare, an obnoxious attitude that is comparable to racism and sexism. That is, it is the unequal disadvantageous treatment of creatures that are not categorized as belonging to one or more particular species. It can also be termed the unfair deliberation of those who lack the human capacity and do not belong in a certain group.

Is Speciesism a Moral Evil?

Singer argues that the people’s attitudes towards the animals are speciesist. However, belonging in a given species is in itself irrelevant to moral consideration. Hence, much of humans’ relations and attitudes towards the faunas are based on the intellectual capability (Bruers, 2013). As such, speciesism is not an evil practice as racism and sexism but a good and natural proclivity. Notably, there is a substantial variance in racism, sexism, and speciesism. Animals are not confined to the unequal treatment because they have furs and feathers, but due to their dissimilarity to humans in a manner that could be determined as virtuously irrelevant (Caviola, Jim & Nadira, 2018). Intelligence is regarded as having a morally relevant aptitude because of its association with the ability to perform ethical obligations.

Is It Wrong for Humans to Eat Meat?

It is immoral for people to eat meat since there are numerous risks involved in the process including ways in which the animals are handled before they are killed. For example, meat has numerous fat which if enters the blood can lead to blockage of the arteries, thus, limits the supply of oxygen to the muscles (Wu, 2014). Nations that exercise a vegetarian diet such as China have been found to have minimal cases of breast cancer diseases than other countries that the majority of its citizens consume meat. Animal suffering is reduced by eating vegetables since other studies have articulated that animals have feelings and sensations just like human beings. For instance, a one year old pig and sheep have higher logical thoughts and intelligence than human babies that are six week old.

Personal Position

Animals are to be given similar treatment irrespective of the species they are in since both the faunas experience pain and suffering when injured. It cannot be stipulated that cognitive capabilities are used to determine treatment of animals. For example, farmed animals such as cows have been found to have high intelligence and are able to know when an enemy is approaching unlike humans who cannot understand when they are in danger (Caviola, Jim & Nadira, 2018). Additionally, empirical findings indicate that animals precisely vertebrates such as dogs, cats, and cows grieve to a level similar to humankind.


The name of my pet is Rex and it is a German shepherd breed, black and brown in color. Owning a pet is one of the significant parts of my life since it has helped me in relieving stress. Therefore, having a pet has substantially changed my perception of fauna since I found that animals also feel pain and suffering when exposed to pain. Further, animals have higher intelligence than severe mentally challenged individuals as they are able to differentiate between the family members and a visitor.



Bruers, S. (2013). Speciesism as a Moral Heuristic. Philosophia, 41(2), 489-501.

Caviola, L., Everett, J. A., & Faber, N. S. (2018). The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism. Journal of personality and social psychology.

Singer, P. (1977). Animal liberation. Towards an end to man’s inhumanity to animals. Granada Publishing Ltd..

Wu, J. Y. (2014). Everyone Vegetarian, World Enriching. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4(02), 160.