Sample Film Review Paper on Is Homeland Harmful?

Homeland is a television show that casts films and series, which depict how a conflict world looks like when in war. This program enlightens the people with the reality of what war can do to humanity. As a result, it achieves a moral lesson of improving human relationship amongst its viewers. However, the program presents a different scene of events, which could be questionable on different angles. From a personal point of view, the television show is harmful, and it should have its operating license reviewed.

From an international point of view, Middle-East is the most affected region across the entire world. According to recent conflicts, military war is promoted by the interests of leadership and governance between different factions of a country. The role that the international community plays in this region is critical in ensuring that human rights are observed in avoiding massive deaths from the war as well as the fighting (Rosenberg 8). The nature in which Homeland presents this conflict incites the viewers against a certain group of different cultural origin. Logically, the only religion that is dominant in the Middle-East happens to be Islam. Consequently, it would be critical to acknowledge that the show seems to be promoting practices that describe the oppression of the Muslim minority.

It is also important to note that Homeland airs sensitive content, which can harm the logical thinking of an innocent viewer in the audience. Since most of its shows are conflict-related, it is common to find agitated Muslims reacting negatively to a film that has Arabic descent as characters that play the role of the oppressed (Durkay np). Consequently, Homeland is considered harmful to the mindset of a particular minority group and this would erupt into a conflict if an affected audience fails to contain the incitement pressure. This could, similarly, be attributed to recent gun shootings across high schools in the United States.

Homeland is also harmful in the sense that it threatens the national security of a country if oppression practices are elevated to entertainment levels. For instance, scenes in the show, which depict an oppression activity on a character of Arabic descent would cause an uprising in different parts of the section. This uprising would include online movements that condemn certain practices against a minority group of people (Jackson 123). Similarly, it would be common to find organized protests and mass demonstration sending a message of human rights protection. The show, essentially, accelerates religious discrimination when characters from the minority groups are assigned controversial roles such as slavery.

Homeland would also be criticized for not censoring sensitive information from the public. This is a show that can provide a conceptual framework for an organized attack that leads to massive deaths. For instance, classified information of how modern governments handle their international relations would motivate a crime against humanity resulting from an agitated group of audience. Detailed information is dangerous when ignorantly released to the public irrespective of its nature. For instance, classified information such as the operations of a government’s public database and personal identity information handling is sensitive to an elite audience as they can devise a way of running a parallel government. Subsequently, it would be genuine to state that Homeland is a TV show that promotes oppression of a minority group in the U.S. and should be regulated for public and national interests.

 

Works Cited

Durkay, Laura. “‘Homeland’is the most bigoted show on television.” The Washington        Post (2014).

Jackson, Sherman A. “Denise A. Spellberg, Thomas Jefferson’s Qur’an: Islam and the Founders.” (2018): 121-125.

Rosenberg, Yair. “‘Homeland’Is Anything but Islamophobic.” The Atlantic (2012). 1-10.