Sample Healthcare Paper on The Right to Die

The Right to Die

Maynard’s case presented a turning point in some districts including California. The argument about the right to die presents an ethical dilemma in terms of its impacts on those affected. In the case, Maynard, proved her point by moving from the state of California to Oregon, where she felt that her perspective about the right to die could be understood. The position presented by the case is such that it is difficult to determine whether the right to die is ethical or unethical. The proponents of the right base their arguments on its impacts on the terminally ill.

In my opinion, I feel that the right to die can be challenging for a court of law to establish. On the one hand, the individual pursuing this right ought to be capable of proving that they are experiencing pain that is strong enough to warrant the right to die. On the other hand, pain cannot be quantified by others who have not experienced it. As such, allowing the right to life can be ethical if used to help individuals who are really suffering yet can cause a lot of pain to those who remain behind. Considering the deontological ethical theories, an action should be judged as either right or wrong depending on the impacts it has on people. A moral action brings the optimum good for a maximum number of people. On the other hand, unethical acts bring about positive outcomes for a limited number of people. While the right to die eases the burden of pain for the terminally ill, it may also affect those who are close to the victims emotionally. As such, it may not be that right in view of its impacts.