Sample Nursing Paper on Innovation to Help Children with Diabetes

Innovation to Help Children with Diabetes

Diabetes is a difficult disease for children to manage meaning that they need some form of assistance to handle it effectively. For children with Type 1 diabetes, attention to detail is a key part of regulating the disease since the benefits of early detection as well as management will be felt in the entire course of their lives. The use of the Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGM) aid management tool is effective in the management of diabetes because the tool facilitates a simple way to improve glucose monitoring whilst providing nutritional information.

Continuous Glucose Aid Management

Glucose monitoring is one of the most difficult to examine and burdensome aspects of diabetes management. The finger stick reading only shows the glucose level at only one point and has to be considered in relation with an individual’s level of activity as well as what he/she has consumed (Radhakrishnan et al, 2016). As such, it only provides a snapshot of the state of a child with Diabetes. However, CGM’s enable perpetual glucose monitoring. The professional model is worn somewhere at the back and is small thus convenient. Additionally, it takes readings every five minutes for three days. However, the child must do four finger sticks daily to enable the calibration of sensor data. When the data are downloaded at the doctor’s office, it is relayed in a graph depicting the glucose levels of the child. It has the benefit of depicting blood sugar level during levels and the impact of exercise. The device is age appropriate as it enables children to understand graphs since they can perceive what is happening.

On top reading blood sugar levels, the CGMs show one or two up or down signs that depict trends. Such information is quite useful for the regulation of blood sugar and mitigating hypoglycemic reactions. A significant learning curve of how to react to the trending data exists as the date usually lags 20 minutes behind the actual blood sugar levels. Nonetheless, the feedback helps children to make informed decisions (Price et al, 2013). Since children are proficient in using technology, they can do well with this device.

Along with glucose planning, the device comes with a dietitian tool that helps children to understand nutritional principles, come up with strategies for eating outside the home, and develop meal plans. It educates children to approach their condition proactively to have a chance of delaying, and is some instances, mitigating the side effects that were once associated with diabetes. The tool creates a database that has nutritional information, for instance, the number of calories, nutrients, fiber, sugar, and carbohydrates for more than 100,000 foods. A child only needs to download an app that is connected to the online database to adjust portion sizes to suit him/her. Users can develop food logs to assist them track when they eat, how much they eat, the level of sugar they consume, and the amount of fiber in their meals. They can also observe how certain changes in their diet can impact its total content. A recipe examiner enables users to cut and paste a meal recipe into it, and then develops a label for one serving that item. It is easy to use and helps in the effective management of diet. Nonetheless, a child must be at least 13 years old to use it. Parents have to help younger children use it.

The use of CGM has transformed how children observe their glucose levels and develop their meal plans. It is a simple tool that is highly convenient. The device is attached to the back of a child and creates graphs that are easy for him or her interpret. With the help of a smartphone app, it enables a child to create effective meal plans to manage diabetes. The simplicity of this service makes it a must have for children with Type 1 diabetes.





Price, J. H., Khubchandani, J., McKinney, M., & Braun, R. (2013). Racial/ethnic disparities in chronic diseases of youths and access to health care in the United States. Biomed Research International, 2013787616. doi:10.1155/2013/787616

Radhakrishnan, K., Xie, B., Berkley, A., & Kim, M. (2016). Barriers and Facilitators for Sustainability of Tele-Homecare Programs: A Systematic Review. Health Services Research, 51(1), 48-75. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12327