Sample Sociology Paper on Status Consistency

Status Consistency

Social stratification system is used to determine a person’s social position in the society. Some of the factors that are used to evaluate the social stratification of a person are occupation, income and education. The term status consistence is utilized by sociologists when describing the consistency levels of an individual’s rank in the society based on factors such as occupation, income levels and education. Those with a flexible class system are considered to have lower status consistency. The class system perfectly explains the concept of lower status consistency. It is because people fall into different classes in the society based on important factors such as occupation income, wealth, and education. A community that has low status consistency has a class system whereby an individual have more choices to choose from that might later change their status in the community.

A perfect example of a low status consistency is a case where a person goes to school, attains a degree in high school but fails to join college. Within the society, such individual is considered to belong to the lower-middle class because of low education levels. However, the fact that such a person did not attain college degree does not limit them from seeking other opportunities that could better their life. The person can decide to get involved in a manual work and start earning good money which ranks them in the middle class level in the society. The same person can further decide to explore more opportunities in the society by taking the money that they had saved and starting their own company or business. At this point, the person has attained the employer position and stands a chance to win larger contracts with manufacturers that would boost her/his company’s performance. When this happens, the person starts earning more money and within a short period of time will be considered to belong to the upper class because of the amount of wealth he/she shall have acquired from business. It shows there is a strong correlation between class system and low status consistency.

The positive impacts of low status consistency are the fact that a person has a chance to explore more opportunities and choices in the society and use them for their own benefits. The far that a person can go or reach in life in terms of class in the society does not have a direct correlation with where they start from in life but based on the ability of an individual to explore and properly use the opportunities within their reach.  The negative ramifications of cultures with low status consistency is that they can be limited with choices when there is a position that demands for a particular factor such as education levels to acquire an opportunity in the society. Another negative ramification is that if a person does not explore opportunities, they cannot stand a chance to better their life or relate with certain class of people in the society. It means that low status consistency requires hard work for a person to change their social class or position in the society.

In conclusion, class system is used to define low status consistency because it leaves people with choices that have the potential to change their status in the community. There are both positive and negative ramifications of low status consistency that needs to be taken into consideration when evaluating the concept.