Sample Summary Paper on The socio-political situation on Ebola

The socio-political situation of contemporary environmental, medical disasters has a tendency of being defined outside the scale of certified public health and epidemiological assessments into the sources of such tragedies. On the other hand, research shows that popular accounts of the disasters tend to center entirely on the task of some people and political forces while lessening the role of ecological aspects. Some of the essential ethics of disease ecology affirm that community and natural settings create a dynamic and intricate system at equilibrium. In such an environment, it is assumed that human-stimulated distresses on the equilibrium, for instance, major variations in land utilization will provoke impacts that reverberate all through the entire system and facilitate the appearance and transmission of new illnesses. In evaluating how precisely such distress on the natural setting influences public health, studies call for the creation of a wider framework in which to locate the connection amid health situation, progress, and environmental variation. Researchers affirm that a special focus on the causal aspect offers an imperfect or fuzzy depiction of the origins of an environmental, medical disaster. In his study, Ali (2004) develops a socio-ecological assessment to illustrate how the outbreak of waterborne E. coli occurred as a result of an intricate interplay and interlinking of ecological and social practices. By centering on the recognition and evaluation of the extensive institutional and biophysical aspects that result in the creation of environmental, medical disasters, it is believed that the execution of socio-ecological evaluation will assist loosen the intricacy. Consequently, progress will be realized towards bridging the creativity gap so that eventually, preventative actions may be undertaken in the future.

Ebola hemorrhagic fever represents a deadly disease that is caused by a virus and is known to be incurable. Just a few outbreaks of the disease have been experienced with a couple of the worst ones occurring in Africa in 1976 (Benini & Bradford‐Benini, 1996). The moment a new outbreak was noticed in Zaire in 1995, it was broadly taken as a danger to the West and public interest was intense. A major intervention, comprising of the collaboration of US and UN agencies led to the end of the outbreak in just about two months. Studies establish that the intervention succeeded owing to a number of reasons. For instance, successful cooperation enhanced the network that had been created by virologists from the time of the 1976 epidemic, global pressure and NGO activism, and cultural aspects had prepared the world (especially the West) for such an outbreak. Moreover, the esteem and experience of worldwide responders, especially the WHO and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, assisted in making the disaster a containable one. Ideas of the Zairian systems that could have hindered the success of the approach were successfully revised. The fight against Ebola outbreaks was won mainly because of the optimism and competence of the WHO, CDC, and other stakeholders, who, comprehending the impact of the disease, did not question the possibility of its effectively being managed. Such optimism ought to result in unrelenting action in case of any future outbreaks. Taking into consideration the intricacy of the disasters, funds and other supplies have to be balanced between scientific advancement and the improvement of the lives of people who suffer the disasters. On the same note, socioeconomic development may ultimately be the most significant barrier to the virus.




Ali, S. H. (2004). A socio-ecological autopsy of the E. coli O157: H7 outbreak in Walkerton, Ontario, Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 58(12), 2601-2612.

Benini, A. A., & Bradford‐Benini, J. (1996). Ebola virus: From medical emergency to complex disaster? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(1), 10-19.